Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL3, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 13 months later than the E-PL3 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-PL3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Olympus PEN E-PL3. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL3
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | September 2011 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-PL3 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL3
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL3 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the E-PL3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL3 is 79 and 88 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The graphic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL3.
All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will render greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern M-E Typ 220 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 313 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 69 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $0 | $399 |