Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Released September 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview

Here is a extensive assessment of the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL3, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 13 months later than the E-PL3 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-PL3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL3

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL3 
ReleasedSeptember 2012September 2011Fresher by 13 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PL3 M-E Typ 220 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL3

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL3 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL3 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).

Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the E-PL3.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL3 is 79 and 88 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The graphic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL3.

All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will render greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern M-E Typ 220 should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-PL3 Portrait photography advice
71
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography details
Olympus E-PL3 Street photography details
65
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
84
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography highlights
46
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview feature
low fps (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (6.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (300 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL3
57
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
44
lack of Timelapse mode
low battery pack (300 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL3
61
manual focus
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
low battery pack (300 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging details
Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging details
9
no video recording
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL3
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PL3
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PL3
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-09-17 2011-09-20
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Truepic VI
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 2500 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lbs) 313 grams (0.69 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 69 52
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 20.9
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 10.3
DXO Low light rating 787 499
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $0 $399