Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL7 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
81
Overall
64

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Revealed September 2014
  • Older Model is Olympus E-PL6
  • Successor is Olympus E-PL8
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL7, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-PL7 (16MP) is fairly close but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL7 (Four Thirds) use different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M-E Typ 220 was brought out 23 months earlier than the E-PL7 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up against the E-PL7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL7

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL7 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PL7 M-E Typ 220 
RevealedSeptember 2014September 2012Fresher by 23 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL7

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL7 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Leica M-E Typ 220 comes with external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL7 has sizing of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).

Contrast the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL7 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-PL7.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL7 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The visual below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL7.

As you can tell, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will render more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PL7 as a Portrait photography camera
71
you can focus manually
good resolution (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
no liveview
72
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL7 as a Street photography camera
65
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
84
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography information
Olympus E-PL7 Sports photography information
46
good resolution (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography info
Olympus E-PL7 Travel photography info
57
good resolution (18 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
85
boasts focus via touch
decent megapixels (16MP)
selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-PL7 Landscape photography factors
61
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Leica M mount)
good resolution (18 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5")
no liveview
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-PL7 Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
78
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL7 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL7
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PL7
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PL7
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-17 2014-09-01
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5212 x 3472 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 2500 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 81
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lbs) 357 grams (0.79 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 69 72
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 12.4
DXO Low light rating 787 873
Other
Battery life - 350 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $0 $499