Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
Portability
86
Imaging
55
Features
76
Overall
63

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2012
Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL7
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
Photography Glossary

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview

The following is a thorough assessment of the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-PL8, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-PL8 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL8 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M-E Typ 220 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the E-PL8 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-PL8 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL8

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL8 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PL8 M-E Typ 220 
ReleasedSeptember 2016September 2012Newer by 48 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL8

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL8 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 features exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL8 has dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).

Check out the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-PL8 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-PL8.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL8 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL8.

As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M-E Typ 220 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL8
71
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
73
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL8 as a Street photography camera
65
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
84
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
supports focus via touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography info
Olympus E-PL8 Sports photography info
46
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PL8 Travel photography factors
57
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
72
supports focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-PL8 Landscape photography advice
61
has manual focus
change lenses (Leica M mount)
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL8 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
36
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL8
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PL8
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PL8
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-09-17 2016-09-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5212 x 3472 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 2500 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 81
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585g (1.29 lbs) 357g (0.79 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 69 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 787 not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $0 $500