Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
Portability
85
Imaging
56
Features
78
Overall
64

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Released February 2018
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M-E Typ 220 was released 6 years earlier than the E-PL9 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the M-E Typ 220 scores against the E-PL9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL9

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL9 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PL9 M-E Typ 220 
ReleasedFebruary 2018September 2012More recent by 65 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL9

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL9 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 enjoys outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).

Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-PL9.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL9 is 79 and 85 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL9.

Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PL9 as a Portrait photography camera
71
focusing manually
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
73
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography factors
Olympus E-PL9 Street photography factors
65
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
84
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports focus via touch
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography advice
46
MP count decent (18MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
69
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PL9 as a Travel photography camera
57
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
77
supports bluetooth
supports focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography info
Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography info
61
focusing manually
change lenses (Leica M mount)
MP count decent (18MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.5")
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL9 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
35
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL9
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PL9
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PL9
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-17 2018-02-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5212 x 3472 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 2500 6400
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 121
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec 8.6 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.60 m (at ISO 200)
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 gr (1.29 lb) 380 gr (0.84 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 69 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 787 not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $0 $599