Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M-E Typ 220 was released 6 years earlier than the E-PL9 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the M-E Typ 220 scores against the E-PL9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL9
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-PL9 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | September 2012 | More recent by 65 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL9
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 enjoys outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-PL9.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL9 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL9.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 8.6 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 lb) | 380 gr (0.84 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $599 |