Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Announced November 2011
  • Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 10 months later than the E-PM1 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the M-E Typ 220 grades against the E-PM1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PM1

 M-E Typ 220 E-PM1 
AnnouncedSeptember 2012November 2011More recent by 10 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PM1 M-E Typ 220 
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM1

 M-E Typ 220 E-PM1 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM1 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).

Analyze the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the M-E Typ 220 against the E-PM1.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PM1 is 79 and 89 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The graphic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PM1.

To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent M-E Typ 220 provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography factors
71
has manual focus
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
60
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
supports RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography factors
Olympus E-PM1 Street photography factors
65
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography features
Olympus E-PM1 Sports photography features
46
resolution is good (18MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PM1 as a Travel photography camera
57
resolution is good (18MP)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
45
no Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM1
61
has manual focus
switch lenses (Leica M mount)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
65
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-PM1 Vlogging highlights
9
no video shooting
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no mic socket
Photography Glossary

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM1
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PM1
General Information
Brand Leica Olympus
Model Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PM1
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-09-17 2011-11-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 2500 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585g (1.29 lb) 265g (0.58 lb)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 69 52
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 21.0
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 10.3
DXO Low light score 787 499
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $499