Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-PM2 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M-E Typ 220 was unveiled 8 months prior to the E-PM2 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the M-E Typ 220 grades against the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PM2
M-E Typ 220 | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-PM2 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | September 2012 | More modern by 8 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM2
M-E Typ 220 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 features physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-PM2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PM2 is 79 and 89 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PM2.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 69 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 787 | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $448 |