Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2012
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed May 2013
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-PM2 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M-E Typ 220 was unveiled 8 months prior to the E-PM2 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the M-E Typ 220 grades against the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PM2

 M-E Typ 220 E-PM2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PM2 M-E Typ 220 
RevealedMay 2013September 2012More modern by 8 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM2

 M-E Typ 220 E-PM2 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 features physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-PM2.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PM2 is 79 and 89 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PM2.

To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography features
Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography features
71
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (18 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
71
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Street photography with Olympus E-PM2
65
sensor size is large (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
79
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with focus via touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Sports photography with Olympus E-PM2
46
megapixel count decent (18 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Travel photography with Olympus E-PM2
57
megapixel count decent (18MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
66
comes with focus via touch
good resolution (16 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Landscape photography camera
61
has manual focus
change lenses (Leica M mount)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
74
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging information
Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging information
9
can't record video
36
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PM2
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Make Leica Olympus
Model Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PM2
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-09-17 2013-05-21
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Maximum resolution 5212 x 3472 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 2500 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lbs) 269 grams (0.59 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 69 72
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 12.2
DXO Low light score 787 932
Other
Battery life - 360 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $0 $448