Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax Q10
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Pentax. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and Q7 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and Q7 (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M-E Typ 220 was brought out 10 months before the Q7 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up vs the Q7 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Pentax Q7. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Pentax Q7
M-E Typ 220 | Q7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
Q7 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | September 2012 | Fresher by 10 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Pentax Q7
M-E Typ 220 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 enjoys exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Pentax Q7 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
See the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 against the Q7.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and Q7 is 79 and 92 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M-E Typ 220 and Q7.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will provide you with more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Pentax |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Pentax Q7 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Pentax Q |
Number of lenses | 59 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 200 grams (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $480 |