Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M-E Typ 220 was released 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the M-E Typ 220 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 M-E Typ 220 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
LaunchedSeptember 2012November 2009More recent by 35 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro M-E Typ 220 
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 M-E Typ 220 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 79 and 77 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Clearly, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer M-E Typ 220 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
71
manual focus
good MP (18MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
55
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography details
65
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
62
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography info
46
good MP (18 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
32
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
doesn't have liveview
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (320 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography highlights
57
good MP (18MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
49
has built in flash
not so great battery (320 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography advice
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
good MP (18 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
46
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3")
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery (320 CIPA)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M-E Typ 220
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
9
lack of video recording
20
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Leica M-E Typ 220Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Leica Ricoh
Model Leica M-E Typ 220 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Type Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-09-17 2009-11-10
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5212 x 3472 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 2500 3200
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 59 -
Focal length multiplier 1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 180s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/3200s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585 gr (1.29 lb) 453 gr (1.00 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 69 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 787 not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $0 $566