Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8079/f8079e7e62404f7aa04408153c07ce853fa40b12" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a7c2/5a7c200f7198b7d871a7cc0f294d85a2774e776e" alt="Samsung NX1100 front Samsung NX1100 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Released April 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX1000
- New Model is Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX1100, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Samsung. The image resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the NX1100 (20MP) is pretty similar but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and NX1100 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 6 months earlier than the NX1100 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the M-E Typ 220 scores vs the NX1100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Samsung NX1100. The entire galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Samsung NX1100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Samsung NX1100
M-E Typ 220 | NX1100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1100 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
NX1100 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX1100
M-E Typ 220 | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | ![]() | April 2013 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 provides exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1100 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX1100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 against the NX1100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b8b7/7b8b79bed54d39d49e8e00f4de633d8cfdadc1b6" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and NX1100 is 79 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ea24/1ea242375f13c974e0dc2b3e64dc19c38ad2ff60" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and NX1100.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung NX1100 will deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8208c/8208c4abc191983f2d2627f4aa78c56d6ece5a11" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cafd/4cafd037260bc3c3d7ddb150fd93bb87471a29f5" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Samsung NX1100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Samsung |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Samsung NX1100 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2013-04-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 59 | 32 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | 852 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $600 |