Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200
79 Imaging
63 Features
28 Overall
49
90 Imaging
60 Features
57 Overall
58
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Released February 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX100
- Renewed by Samsung NX210
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Samsung NX200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and NX200 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 7 months later than the NX200 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the M-E Typ 220 scores vs the NX200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Samsung NX200
| M-E Typ 220 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 | February 2012 | More recent by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
| NX200 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX200
| M-E Typ 220 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 enjoys exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Samsung NX200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the NX200.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and NX200 is 79 and 90 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The visual below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and NX200.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Samsung NX200 will give more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern M-E Typ 220 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Samsung |
| Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Samsung NX200 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 2500 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 59 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 585 grams (1.29 pounds) | 223 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 69 | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | 787 | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $818 |