Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8079/f8079e7e62404f7aa04408153c07ce853fa40b12" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sigma Quattro, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Sigma. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The M-E Typ 220 was released 4 years before the Quattro which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Sigma Quattro
M-E Typ 220 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Leica M-E Typ 220
Quattro | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 41 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sigma Quattro
M-E Typ 220 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M-E Typ 220 comes with external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02829/02829f8b59efce1f3f62c63d119e00157996040f" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and Quattro is 79 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36ae8/36ae82723803703cbd000f5792334e9bf610388a" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M-E Typ 220 and Quattro.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5969/e5969cc460b74475b3be136350454fb7e3ffeafd" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/681ad/681ad1a0742acc9e49c7162c93be5ee8145e986e" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Sigma |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 59 | 76 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $738 |