Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H
79 Imaging
64 Features
28 Overall
49
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sigma Quattro H, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and Quattro H (APS-H) have different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 4 years before the Quattro H which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the M-E Typ 220 grades vs the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Sigma Quattro H
| M-E Typ 220 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Leica M-E Typ 220
| Quattro H | M-E Typ 220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | September 2012 | Newer by 41 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sigma Quattro H
| M-E Typ 220 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 features outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the M-E Typ 220 vs the Quattro H.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and Quattro H is 79 and 78 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and Quattro H.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M-E Typ 220 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will offer you greater detail due to its extra 27MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Sigma |
| Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-H |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 45MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Max native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Sigma SA |
| Amount of lenses | 59 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 585g (1.29 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 69 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 787 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $1,134 |