Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
78 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Revealed September 2020
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c Overview
Below, we are matching up the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony A7c, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and A7c (24MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (Full frame).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M-E Typ 220 was revealed 9 years before the A7c which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up vs the A7c in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony Alpha A7c. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Sony A7c
| M-E Typ 220 | A7c |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Leica M-E Typ 220
| A7c | M-E Typ 220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2020 |  | September 2012 | Newer by 97 months |
| Display type | Fully articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony A7c
| M-E Typ 220 | A7c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has got physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Sony A7c has specifications of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") with a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony A7c in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the A7c.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and A7c is 79 and 78 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and A7c.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Sony A7c to offer more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony A7c Specifications
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Alpha A7c | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Sony |
| Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Alpha A7c |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2020-09-14 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 51200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Leica M | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 59 | 122 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 509 grams (1.12 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 69 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 740 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $1,800 |