Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8079/f8079e7e62404f7aa04408153c07ce853fa40b12" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/526da/526dac145d03c96f401b53f00c4068ea38345a6c" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5 front Sony Alpha NEX-5 front"
89 Imaging
54 Features
58 Overall
55
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 287g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Updated by Sony NEX-5N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and NEX-5 (14MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and NEX-5 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The M-E Typ 220 was brought out 2 years after the NEX-5 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M-E Typ 220 scores against the NEX-5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Sony Alpha NEX-5. The entire galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Sony NEX-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Sony NEX-5
M-E Typ 220 | NEX-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
NEX-5 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony NEX-5
M-E Typ 220 | NEX-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has got physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5 has sizing of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Check out the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 vs the NEX-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53be5/53be5834a62c313089e5e7b86378e1a18bb533f1" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and NEX-5 is 79 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d2f4/8d2f4819d30c1f0ecb8fedd16ce685507c24e872" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 top view buttons comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and NEX-5.
As you can see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will show more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent M-E Typ 220 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6407d/6407d1ab455ca7cc02412ee8b1831b73db8a3363" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 sensor size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 sensor size comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ed7/57ed7f3e8c411919cb1a8b01cf532b7575289be7" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-5 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Alpha NEX-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Sony |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Alpha NEX-5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2010-06-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 lb) | 287 gr (0.63 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 22.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 787 | 796 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $599 |