Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3
79 Imaging
64 Features
28 Overall
49
86 Imaging
56 Features
60 Overall
57
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Replaced the Sony NEX-C3
- Successor is Sony NEX-3N
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sony NEX-F3, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Sony. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is relatively close but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 2 months after the NEX-F3 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the M-E Typ 220 scores vs the NEX-F3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Sony NEX-F3
| M-E Typ 220 | NEX-F3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
| NEX-F3 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony NEX-F3
| M-E Typ 220 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | August 2012 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 provides exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sony NEX-F3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the NEX-F3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and NEX-F3 is 79 and 86 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and NEX-F3.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will result in extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Sony |
| Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2012-09-17 | 2012-08-16 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 2500 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 59 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 585 grams (1.29 pounds) | 314 grams (0.69 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 69 | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 787 | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $0 | $470 |