Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II
74 Imaging
71 Features
47 Overall
61
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Leica M Edition 60 versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M Edition 60 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is pretty similar but the M Edition 60 (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M Edition 60 was unveiled 24 months before the E-M1 II which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Edition 60 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the M Edition 60 scores vs the E-M1 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Edition 60 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Edition 60 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Edition 60 over the Olympus E-M1 II
M Edition 60 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica M Edition 60
E-M1 II | M Edition 60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | September 2014 | Fresher by 24 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus E-M1 II
M Edition 60 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M Edition 60 enjoys exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Edition 60 versus Olympus E-M1 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the M Edition 60 vs the E-M1 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M Edition 60 and E-M1 II is 74 and 68 respectively.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M Edition 60 and E-M1 II.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Edition 60 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Edition 60 will offer you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older M Edition 60 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-09-23 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 574g (1.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Single | Dual |
Launch price | - | $1,700 |