Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Here, we are looking at the Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M Edition 60 (24MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is very well matched but the M Edition 60 (Full frame) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) provide different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M Edition 60 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the E-M1 III and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Edition 60 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the M Edition 60 matches up versus the E-M1 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Edition 60 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Edition 60 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| M Edition 60 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Leica M Edition 60
| E-M1 III | M Edition 60 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | September 2014 | Fresher by 65 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus E-M1 III
| M Edition 60 | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Leica M Edition 60 offers outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the M Edition 60 versus the E-M1 III.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Edition 60 and E-M1 III is 74 and 67 respectively.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M Edition 60 and E-M1 III.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Edition 60 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Edition 60 will give you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older M Edition 60 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
| Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2014-09-23 | 2020-02-11 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic IX |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 121 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 680 grams (1.50 lb) | 580 grams (1.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Card slots | One | 2 |
| Price at launch | - | $1,800 |