Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5754/a57541af9b1158712aa1d32b9806751092f9f3be" alt="Leica M Typ 240 front Leica M Typ 240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/229aa/229aa0929b6b94738a78a17037e34d6d0b57e701" alt="Nikon 1 V1 front Nikon 1 V1 front"
84 Imaging
40 Features
68 Overall
51
Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon 1 Mount
- 383g - 113 x 76 x 44mm
- Announced January 2012
- Refreshed by Nikon 1 V2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Nikon. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and 1 V1 (10MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and 1 V1 (1") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The M Typ 240 was brought out 9 months later than the 1 V1 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the M Typ 240 matches up vs the 1 V1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 240 and Nikon 1 V1. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Nikon 1 V1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Nikon 1 V1
M Typ 240 | 1 V1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon 1 V1 over the Leica M Typ 240
1 V1 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Nikon 1 V1
M Typ 240 | 1 V1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 comes with outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Nikon 1 V1 has specifications of 113mm x 76mm x 44mm (4.4" x 3.0" x 1.7") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the M Typ 240 compared to the 1 V1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edda9/edda9dc660e78c72ed3b77b6a263190ca6e83bd3" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and 1 V1 is 74 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddf71/ddf71cdcbb8389b101fff21cd74c69d2493015de" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and 1 V1.
To sum up, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer greater detail having its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f8cc/9f8ccd2da47f8caf2308958aec13f4294fbec146" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c982/0c98230208e380b03f0c996ff0ec9c6f70f96b16" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Nikon 1 V1 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Nikon 1 V1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Nikon |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Nikon 1 V1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2012-01-20 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 135 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Nikon 1 |
Number of lenses | 59 | 13 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 1072 x 720 (60 fps) 640 x 240 (400), 320 x 120 (1200) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lb) | 383g (0.84 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 113 x 76 x 44mm (4.4" x 3.0" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 84 | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | 11.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | 346 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 350 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | EN-EL15 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $5,479 | $670 |