Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
65 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Announced February 2022
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the OM System OM-1 (20MP) is fairly similar but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M Typ 240 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the OM System OM-1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the OM System OM-1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the OM System OM-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 240 & OM System OM-1. The full galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the OM System OM-1
| M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Leica M Typ 240
| OM System OM-1 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2022 | September 2012 | Newer by 114 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper display (+700k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1
| M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3.00" | Equal display size |
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 enjoys external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the OM System OM-1 has measurements of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") and a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the OM System OM-1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1 is 74 and 65 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2022-02-15 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 1053 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 1053 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 59 | 118 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3" | 3.00" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.83x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 599g (1.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 520 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLX-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Card slots | One | Dual |
| Price at launch | $5,479 | $2,199 |