Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
65 Imaging
64 Features
96 Overall
76
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Announced February 2022
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the OM System OM-1 (20MP) is fairly similar but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe M Typ 240 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the OM System OM-1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the OM System OM-1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the OM System OM-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 240 & OM System OM-1. The full galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the OM System OM-1
M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Leica M Typ 240
OM System OM-1 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2022 | September 2012 | Newer by 114 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper display (+700k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1
M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3.00" | Equal display size |
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 enjoys external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the OM System OM-1 has measurements of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") and a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the OM System OM-1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1 is 74 and 65 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and OM System OM-1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | OM System OM-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2022-02-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 1053 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 118 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3.00" |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 599g (1.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 520 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Price at launch | $5,479 | $2,199 |