Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3

Portability
74
Imaging
70
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
48
Features
60
Overall
52

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
  • Introduced August 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus E-P2
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 Overview

Here is a in depth comparison of the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-P3 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-P3 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M Typ 240 was unveiled 14 months later than the E-P3 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the M Typ 240 matches up vs the E-P3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-P3

 M Typ 240 E-P3 
IntroducedSeptember 2012August 2011Fresher by 14 months
Display resolution920k614kClearer display (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-P3 M Typ 240 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P3

 M Typ 240 E-P3 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 240 comes with exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-P3 has proportions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).

Check the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-P3.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-P3 is 74 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 240 and E-P3.

As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will resolve more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 240 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-P3 as a Portrait photography camera
82
you can focus manually
decent MP (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-P3 as a Street photography camera
68
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proof
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
76
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus by touch
screen does not articulate
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-P3 Sports photography advice
56
decent MP (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
environment proof
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography information
Olympus E-P3 Travel photography information
63
environment proof
decent MP (24 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
60
comes with focus by touch
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
low MP (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-P3 Landscape photography advice
74
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proof
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
65
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging info
Olympus E-P3 Vlogging info
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
lack of mic port
35
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P3
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-P3
General Information
Brand Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-P3
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-09-17 2011-08-17
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 35
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m (@ ISO 200)
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 680g (1.50 lbs) 369g (0.81 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 84 51
DXO Color Depth rating 24.0 20.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.3 10.1
DXO Low light rating 1860 536
Other
Battery life 500 images 330 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $5,479 $0