Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5754/a57541af9b1158712aa1d32b9806751092f9f3be" alt="Leica M Typ 240 front Leica M Typ 240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Released October 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-P3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-P5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-P5 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-P5 (Four Thirds) use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The M Typ 240 was introduced 12 months before the E-P5 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the M Typ 240 scores against the E-P5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 & Olympus PEN E-P5. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-P5
M Typ 240 | E-P5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Leica M Typ 240
E-P5 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | ![]() | September 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P5
M Typ 240 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 240 has got external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P5 has dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Look at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-P5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the E-P5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc748/dc7482aea67e37c07de3e2effccaa4a248d46ae3" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 240 and E-P5 is 74 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db639/db6397c1d11dfd0bb39bfdd542ba114509671cc7" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 240 and E-P5.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will resolve extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f345e/f345e7553a26864fa8fc11ad28e6e711b67a80b3" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/888e3/888e320457892f4896c3828f741c9678e253ef28" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2013-10-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lb) | 420g (0.93 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 84 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | 895 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $5,479 | $389 |