Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1

Portability
74
Imaging
70
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced May 2010
  • Successor is Olympus E-PL1s
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M Typ 240 was announced 2 years after the E-PL1 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M Typ 240 matches up against the E-PL1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL1

 M Typ 240 E-PL1 
IntroducedSeptember 2012May 2010More modern by 29 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PL1 M Typ 240 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL1

 M Typ 240 E-PL1 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 240 features outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the E-PL1.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 240 and E-PL1 is 74 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The picture below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 240 and E-PL1.

All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer you more detail with its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer M Typ 240 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M Typ 240
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL1
82
manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M Typ 240
Street photography with Olympus E-PL1
68
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography details
Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography details
56
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
environment sealing
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
terrible battery pack (290 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography features
Olympus E-PL1 Travel photography features
63
environment sealing
resolution is good (24MP)
no Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (290 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Landscape photography camera
74
manual focus
switch lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is good (3")
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
no image stabilization
no Time Lapse function
55
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (290 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging information
Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging information
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no external mic port
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focus
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic socket
Photography Glossary

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL1
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PL1
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PL1
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-09-17 2010-05-17
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680g (1.50 pounds) 334g (0.74 pounds)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 84 54
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 10.1
DXO Low light score 1860 487
Other
Battery life 500 shots 290 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Card slots One One
Cost at release $5,479 $288