Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Announced September 2012
Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Released November 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PL1s, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M Typ 240 was launched 23 months later than the E-PL1s making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the E-PL1s when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL1s

 M Typ 240 E-PL1s 
ReleasedSeptember 2012November 2010More recent by 23 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PL1s M Typ 240 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL1s

 M Typ 240 E-PL1s 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 240 features outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1s has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Check out the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PL1s in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the M Typ 240 compared to the E-PL1s.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and E-PL1s is 74 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The visual underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and E-PL1s.

Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Portrait photography camera
81
has manual focus
decent MP (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography advice
Olympus E-PL1s Street photography advice
67
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M Typ 240
Sports photography with Olympus E-PL1s
55
decent MP (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
weather proof
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
low battery (290 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography details
Olympus E-PL1s Travel photography details
63
weather proof
decent MP (24 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
51
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
low battery (290 CIPA)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Landscape photography camera
73
has manual focus
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
decent sized screen (3")
decent MP (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
55
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
low battery (290 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M Typ 240
Vlogging with Olympus E-PL1s
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
lack of external microphone port
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focus
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL1s
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PL1s
General Information
Brand Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-09-17 2010-11-16
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680 grams (1.50 lbs) 334 grams (0.74 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 1860 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images 290 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Retail price $5,479 $599