Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M Typ 240 was released 20 months later than the E-PL2 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the M Typ 240 grades against the E-PL2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL2

 M Typ 240 E-PL2 
AnnouncedSeptember 2012February 2011More recent by 20 months
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PL2 M Typ 240 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL2

 M Typ 240 E-PL2 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 provides external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).

Examine the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the E-PL2.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 240 and E-PL2 is 74 and 85 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PL2.

All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 240 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography features
Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography features
81
manual focus
decent MP (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
low resolution (12MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL2 as a Street photography camera
67
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography features
Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography features
55
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (280 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography information
Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography information
63
environment proofing
decent MP (24MP)
missing Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (280 shots)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M Typ 240
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL2
73
manual focus
change lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
60
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low resolution (12MP)
not so great battery (280 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging features
Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging features
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing microphone port
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL2
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PL2
General Information
Brand Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PL2
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-17 2011-02-11
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680 grams (1.50 lb) 362 grams (0.80 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 55
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 10.2
DXO Low light score 1860 573
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 280 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $5,479 $0