Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M Typ 240 was released 20 months later than the E-PL2 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the M Typ 240 grades against the E-PL2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 & Olympus PEN E-PL2. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL2
| M Typ 240 | E-PL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2012 | February 2011 | More recent by 20 months | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Leica M Typ 240
| E-PL2 | M Typ 240 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL2
| M Typ 240 | E-PL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 provides external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Examine the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the E-PL2.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 240 and E-PL2 is 74 and 85 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PL2.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 240 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2011-02-11 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Truepic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
| Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 680 grams (1.50 lb) | 362 grams (0.80 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 84 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 10.2 |
| DXO Low light score | 1860 | 573 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 280 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $5,479 | $0 |