Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60


88 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL2

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PL3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

The M Typ 240 was unveiled 13 months after the E-PL3 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the E-PL3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus PEN E-PL3. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL3
M Typ 240 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Newer by 13 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Leica M Typ 240
E-PL3 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL3
M Typ 240 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 has got external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL3 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PL3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-PL3.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and E-PL3 is 74 and 88 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PL3.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 240 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680 gr (1.50 lb) | 313 gr (0.69 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 84 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $5,479 | $399 |