Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
47
Features
52
Overall
49

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Launched September 2012
Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-PL2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview

The following is a extended assessment of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PL3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M Typ 240 was unveiled 13 months after the E-PL3 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the E-PL3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL3

 M Typ 240 E-PL3 
IntroducedSeptember 2012September 2011Newer by 13 months
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PL3 M Typ 240 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL3

 M Typ 240 E-PL3 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 has got external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL3 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).

Compare the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PL3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-PL3.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and E-PL3 is 74 and 88 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PL3.

As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 240 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-PL3 Portrait photography advice
81
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography information
Olympus E-PL3 Street photography information
67
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
84
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography information
Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography information
55
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
weather proofing
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
44
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
low frames per second (6.0 fps)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (300 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography features
Olympus E-PL3 Travel photography features
63
weather proofing
megapixel count decent (24MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
44
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery (300 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M Typ 240
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL3
73
you can focus manually
change lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
60
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (300 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging features
Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging features
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of microphone port
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
no external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL3
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PL3
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PL3
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2012-09-17 2011-09-20
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Truepic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 680 gr (1.50 lb) 313 gr (0.69 lb)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 84 52
DXO Color Depth rating 24.0 20.9
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.3 10.3
DXO Low light rating 1860 499
Other
Battery life 500 images 300 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $5,479 $399