Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5754/a57541af9b1158712aa1d32b9806751092f9f3be" alt="Leica M Typ 240 front Leica M Typ 240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889c2/889c2b7c2818307cae4014173a151fbd44cdaeb0" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL7 front Olympus PEN E-PL7 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL6
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL7 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL7 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The M Typ 240 was revealed 23 months before the E-PL7 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the M Typ 240 scores against the E-PL7 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus PEN E-PL7. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus E-PL7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL7
M Typ 240 | E-PL7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Leica M Typ 240
E-PL7 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | September 2012 | Newer by 23 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL7
M Typ 240 | E-PL7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 enjoys external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL7 has measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL7 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 240 and the E-PL7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1e20/d1e20dedc68a290c38f6752be8cac7d2fe430199" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PL7 is 74 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cc4e/1cc4e7b8a3e8953677bc17d0a826ea6a238b64cf" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 240 and E-PL7.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eb22/4eb223b2c635067b7d1d7451bdcf4a00319cef86" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d997/1d997ddf0659375d7325def3e739300337b2d6f7" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL7 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2014-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680 grams (1.50 lb) | 357 grams (0.79 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 84 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | 873 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $5,479 | $499 |