Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7

Portability
74
Imaging
70
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL7 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
81
Overall
64

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Revealed September 2014
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL6
  • Renewed by Olympus E-PL8
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL7 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL7 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The M Typ 240 was revealed 23 months before the E-PL7 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the M Typ 240 scores against the E-PL7 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL7

 M Typ 240 E-PL7 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PL7 M Typ 240 
RevealedSeptember 2014September 2012Newer by 23 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1037k920kSharper display (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL7

 M Typ 240 E-PL7 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display size3"3"Same display size

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 enjoys external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL7 has measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).

Check out the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL7 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 240 and the E-PL7.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PL7 is 74 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 240 and E-PL7.

All in all, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-PL7 Portrait photography highlights
82
manual focus
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
72
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL7 as a Street photography camera
68
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
features touch focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M Typ 240
Sports photography with Olympus E-PL7
56
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
environment proofing
low fps (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography features
Olympus E-PL7 Travel photography features
63
environment proofing
megapixel count good (24MP)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly display
85
features touch focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
display is selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M Typ 240
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL7
74
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
screen is a good size (3")
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL7 as a Vlogging camera
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
does not have microphone port
78
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL7 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL7
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PL7
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PL7
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-09-17 2014-09-01
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5952 x 3976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 81
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 1,037 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 680 grams (1.50 lb) 357 grams (0.79 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 84 72
DXO Color Depth rating 24.0 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.3 12.4
DXO Low light rating 1860 873
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 350 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $5,479 $499