Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
76
Overall
62

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-PL7
  • Later Model is Olympus E-PL9
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL8 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL8 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M Typ 240 was manufactured 5 years before the E-PL8 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M Typ 240 grades against the E-PL8 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL8

 M Typ 240 E-PL8 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PL8 M Typ 240 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016September 2012Fresher by 48 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1037k920kClearer screen (+117k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL8

 M Typ 240 E-PL8 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 240 features exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL8 has dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).

Compare the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the M Typ 240 compared to the E-PL8.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PL8 is 74 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PL8.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will show extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PL8 as a Portrait photography camera
81
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
72
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography advice
Olympus E-PL8 Street photography advice
67
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
84
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
offers touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-PL8 Sports photography advice
55
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
weather sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-PL8 Travel photography advice
63
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (24MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
71
offers touch focus
MP count decent (16MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-PL8 Landscape photography factors
73
focusing manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL8 as a Vlogging camera
26
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
lack of external microphone socket
35
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL8
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PL8
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PL8
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-17 2016-09-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5952 x 3976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 81
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680g (1.50 pounds) 357g (0.79 pounds)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 1860 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 350 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $5,479 $500