Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60


85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL9, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) use different sensor sizing.

The M Typ 240 was announced 6 years prior to the E-PL9 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the M Typ 240 grades vs the E-PL9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL9
M Typ 240 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Leica M Typ 240
E-PL9 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 65 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL9
M Typ 240 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 features exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-PL9.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PL9 is 74 and 85 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PL9.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will provide greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 pounds) | 380g (0.84 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 350 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $5,479 | $599 |