Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Announced February 2018
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL9, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) use different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M Typ 240 was announced 6 years prior to the E-PL9 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the M Typ 240 grades vs the E-PL9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PL9

 M Typ 240 E-PL9 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PL9 M Typ 240 
AnnouncedFebruary 2018September 2012More modern by 65 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k920kSharper screen (+120k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL9

 M Typ 240 E-PL9 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 features exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).

Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-PL9.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PL9 is 74 and 85 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PL9.

As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will provide greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography factors
81
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW files
73
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M Typ 240
Street photography with Olympus E-PL9
67
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
84
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
offers touch focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography details
Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography details
55
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
69
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M Typ 240
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL9
63
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
no Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
77
has bluetooth
offers touch focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography details
73
has manual focus
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
no image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M Typ 240
Vlogging with Olympus E-PL9
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no external microphone socket
35
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PL9
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PL9
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PL9
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-09-17 2018-02-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 121
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 8.6 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.60 m (at ISO 200)
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 680g (1.50 pounds) 380g (0.84 pounds)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 84 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 24.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1860 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots 350 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $5,479 $599