Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60


89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PM2

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Let's look closer at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PM1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.

The M Typ 240 was unveiled 10 months after the E-PM1 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the M Typ 240 grades against the E-PM1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus PEN E-PM1. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PM1
M Typ 240 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | ![]() | November 2011 | More modern by 10 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Leica M Typ 240
E-PM1 | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PM1
M Typ 240 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 has got outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM1 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PM1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-PM1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PM1 is 74 and 89 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PM1.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will produce extra detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 240 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2011-11-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680 grams (1.50 pounds) | 265 grams (0.58 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $5,479 | $499 |