Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed November 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-PM2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview

Let's look closer at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PM1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M Typ 240 was unveiled 10 months after the E-PM1 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the M Typ 240 grades against the E-PM1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PM1

 M Typ 240 E-PM1 
RevealedSeptember 2012November 2011More modern by 10 months
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PM1 M Typ 240 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PM1

 M Typ 240 E-PM1 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 has got outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM1 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).

Take a look at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus E-PM1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-PM1.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PM1 is 74 and 89 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and E-PM1.

Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will produce extra detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 240 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography features
Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography features
81
focusing manually
good resolution (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography info
Olympus E-PM1 Street photography info
67
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
75
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography features
Olympus E-PM1 Sports photography features
55
good resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
weather sealing
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
49
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography features
Olympus E-PM1 Travel photography features
63
weather sealing
good resolution (24 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
45
lack of Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography highlights
73
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is good (3")
good resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
65
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low MP (12MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging details
Olympus E-PM1 Vlogging details
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone socket
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PM1
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PM1
General Information
Make Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PM1
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-09-17 2011-11-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680 grams (1.50 pounds) 265 grams (0.58 pounds)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 52
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 21.0
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 10.3
DXO Low light score 1860 499
Other
Battery life 500 photos 330 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $5,479 $499