Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Revealed January 2014
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus SP-100, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and SP-100 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and SP-100 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M Typ 240 was introduced 16 months before the SP-100 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M Typ 240 grades against the SP-100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus Stylus SP-100. The whole galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus SP-100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus SP-100
M Typ 240 | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Leica M Typ 240
SP-100 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | September 2012 | More recent by 16 months |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus SP-100
M Typ 240 | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 has got exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus SP-100 has measurements of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") along with a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus SP-100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 and the SP-100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and SP-100 is 74 and 63 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 240 and SP-100.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will produce more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus SP-100 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus Stylus SP-100 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 920 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1700s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 594g (1.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 330 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $5,479 | $400 |