Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5754/a57541af9b1158712aa1d32b9806751092f9f3be" alt="Leica M Typ 240 front Leica M Typ 240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The M Typ 240 was unveiled 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M Typ 240 scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 240 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
M Typ 240 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Leica M Typ 240
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
M Typ 240 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 has outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 240 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf958/cf95835db3a6d2aba8e0237114ce5862b789b8c3" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 74 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dff3/8dff33556df1cecb516eb8aaca88e11bd2f1e9c5" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer you greater detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 240 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/797f8/797f8678bb9ced8f631af2e9f82b722c2e121906" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/373f6/373f6cc17825399047255a3c4120d9c7645b859f" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $5,479 | $566 |