Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Introduced November 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The M Typ 240 was unveiled 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M Typ 240 scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 M Typ 240 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
IntroducedSeptember 2012November 2009Fresher by 35 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Leica M Typ 240

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro M Typ 240 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 M Typ 240 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Display resolution920k920kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 has outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 240 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 74 and 77 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer you greater detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 240 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography info
81
manual focus
megapixel count decent (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
55
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
low MP (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography highlights
67
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
62
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography information
55
megapixel count decent (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
32
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
bad battery life (320 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
63
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (24MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
49
built-in flash
bad battery life (320 per charge)
low MP (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography factors
73
manual focus
change lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse mode
46
manual focus
nice screen size (3")
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (320 shots)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging information
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone support
20
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Leica M Typ 240Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Leica Ricoh
Model type Leica M Typ 240 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Class Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-09-17 2009-11-10
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5952 x 3976 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens support Leica M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 59 -
Crop factor 1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 180 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 680g (1.50 lbs) 453g (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 84 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 24.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1860 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 320 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $5,479 $566