Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5754/a57541af9b1158712aa1d32b9806751092f9f3be" alt="Leica M Typ 240 front Leica M Typ 240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2850/d28501d35c78d6eb572b9a7870ce351b4b1faaf2" alt="Sony Alpha A7 II front Sony Alpha A7 II front"
69 Imaging
71 Features
84 Overall
76
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 599g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Released November 2014
- Older Model is Sony A7
- New Model is Sony A7 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony A7 II, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Leica and Sony. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the A7 II (24MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (Full frame).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The M Typ 240 was announced 3 years before the A7 II and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A7 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the A7 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 & Sony Alpha A7 II. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Sony A7 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Sony A7 II
M Typ 240 | A7 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7 II over the Leica M Typ 240
A7 II | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2014 | ![]() | September 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony A7 II
M Typ 240 | A7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 240 enjoys physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A7 II has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony A7 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 240 and the A7 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32eb0/32eb062d41c82d09dcccd2cbddbd245f0cf573a1" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and A7 II is 74 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25825/258258201910fbe6ba51ab52fa471fb18513f42f" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and A7 II.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older M Typ 240 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f3dc/0f3dcbc6953e70c2233ece579ac42994255a6043" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c540/3c54000d6ece80c7afd4f77ce50fb3d39448b833" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7 II Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha A7 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Sony |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha A7 II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2014-11-20 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Sony E |
Available lenses | 59 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680 grams (1.50 lbs) | 599 grams (1.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 84 | 90 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | 2449 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 350 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $5,479 | $1,456 |