Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Sony Alpha A7S II front
Portability
68
Imaging
61
Features
76
Overall
67

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Sony A7S II
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400 (Increase to 409600)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 627g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
  • Announced October 2015
  • Succeeded the Sony A7S
  • Later Model is Sony A7S III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II Overview

Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Leica and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and A7S II (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (Full frame).

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M Typ 240 was launched 4 years earlier than the A7S II and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A7S II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M Typ 240 grades vs the A7S II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Sony A7S II

 M Typ 240 A7S II 

Reasons to pick Sony A7S II over the Leica M Typ 240

 A7S II M Typ 240 
AnnouncedOctober 2015September 2012More recent by 37 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k920kClearer display (+309k dot)

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony A7S II

 M Typ 240 A7S II 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 features external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Sony A7S II has sizing of 127mm x 96mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 627 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the A7S II.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and A7S II is 74 and 68 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and A7S II.

Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Leica M Typ 240 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M Typ 240
Portrait photography with Sony A7S II
81
has manual focus
good MP (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
68
focusing manually
sensor size is large (Full frame)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M Typ 240
Street photography with Sony A7S II
67
sensor size is great (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
78
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
weather proof
very good ISO range (102,400)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A7S II as a Sports photography camera
55
good MP (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
weather proof
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
58
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
has tracking focus
weather proof
max frames per second very slow (5.0 fps)
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery (370 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A7S II as a Travel photography camera
63
weather proof
good MP (24 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
49
weather proof
not so great battery (370 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography details
Sony A7S II Landscape photography details
73
has manual focus
switch lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good MP (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
71
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
very good ISO range (102,400)
saves RAW files
weather proof
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (370 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging factors
Sony A7S II Vlogging factors
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone jack
35
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic port
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A7S II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Sony A7S II
 Leica M Typ 240Sony Alpha A7S II
General Information
Brand Leica Sony
Model Leica M Typ 240 Sony Alpha A7S II
Class Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-17 2015-10-12
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Full frame
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 35.6 x 23.8mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 847.3mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5952 x 3976 4240 x 2832
Maximum native ISO 6400 102400
Maximum boosted ISO - 409600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 169
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Sony E
Total lenses 59 121
Crop factor 1 1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 1% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.78x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p [60-100Mbps]), Full HD (1920 x 1080 @ 120p/60p/60i/30p/24p [50-100Mbps]), 720p (30p [16Mbps])
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680 grams (1.50 lb) 627 grams (1.38 lb)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 85
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 13.3
DXO Low light score 1860 2993
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 370 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $5,479 $2,767