Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5754/a57541af9b1158712aa1d32b9806751092f9f3be" alt="Leica M Typ 240 front Leica M Typ 240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Updated by Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and NEX-3N (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The M Typ 240 was released 5 months before the NEX-3N and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the M Typ 240 grades against the NEX-3N in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 240 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Sony NEX-3N
M Typ 240 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Leica M Typ 240
NEX-3N | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony NEX-3N
M Typ 240 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | ![]() | February 2013 | Similar age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 comes with outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 240 compared to the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c9be/6c9be1475dc387a260831cce3c1924dd921260b7" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and NEX-3N is 74 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64b15/64b158949748ba86f4126d44b6383125e501824a" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and NEX-3N.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Leica M Typ 240 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1513/b1513f82cd2a0778fc9260c8cabe763ee22610fc" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff953/ff953d13d96c5dd9ca329d27dac1ada2ecd6eb92" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Sony |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Sony E |
Total lenses | 59 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680 gr (1.50 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 84 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 480 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $5,479 | $399 |