Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
89 Imaging
56 Features
76 Overall
64
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Replacement is Sony NEX-5T
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony NEX-5R, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and NEX-5R (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M Typ 240 was announced at a similar time to the NEX-5R and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the M Typ 240 scores vs the NEX-5R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 240 and Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Sony NEX-5R
| M Typ 240 | NEX-5R |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Leica M Typ 240
| NEX-5R | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony NEX-5R
| M Typ 240 | NEX-5R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 | August 2012 | Same generation | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 provides physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5R has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony NEX-5R in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 against the NEX-5R.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and NEX-5R is 74 and 89 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and NEX-5R.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will produce more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Sony |
| Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2012-09-17 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Leica M | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 59 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 680 gr (1.50 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 84 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light score | 1860 | 910 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $5,479 | $750 |