Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Superseded the Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony NEX-C3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 240 was unveiled 14 months after the NEX-C3 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the M Typ 240 grades against the NEX-C3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Sony NEX-C3
M Typ 240 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | August 2011 | Newer by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Leica M Typ 240
NEX-C3 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony NEX-C3
M Typ 240 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 240 offers physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony NEX-C3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 versus the NEX-C3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 240 and NEX-C3 is 74 and 91 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The pic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and NEX-C3.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will show more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 240 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Sony |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 59 | 121 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $5,479 | $343 |