Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5754/a57541af9b1158712aa1d32b9806751092f9f3be" alt="Leica M Typ 240 front Leica M Typ 240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f310/0f3102e29c34c04a3cab68d59e3e137b432fa559" alt="Sony Alpha a5000 front Sony Alpha a5000 front"
89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Old Model is Sony NEX-3N
- Later Model is Sony a5100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Sony a5000, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Sony. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the a5000 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and a5000 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The M Typ 240 was brought out 15 months prior to the a5000 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the M Typ 240 grades vs the a5000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 and Sony Alpha a5000. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Sony a5000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Sony a5000
M Typ 240 | a5000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a5000 over the Leica M Typ 240
a5000 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 15 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony a5000
M Typ 240 | a5000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 provides outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Sony a5000 has measurements of 110mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 240 versus Sony a5000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 240 and the a5000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/215f9/215f9a46b7cd26e0782af403336d40933059440a" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and a5000 is 74 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2076/e2076fa72f3ecc4522bebae766e3f36ba50c79b1" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The picture below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and a5000.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7aa0/e7aa0cf9094ec87b9370a363f6d6f4fdda3d5849" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91b8b/91b8b392dbd2098d240ac1f1291b85e0a65ce2fb" alt="Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony a5000 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha a5000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Sony |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Sony Alpha a5000 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 357.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5456 x 3632 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Sony E |
Total lenses | 59 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD with 180 upward tilt |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i/24p), 1440 x 1080 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 84 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | 1089 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 420 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $5,479 | $448 |