Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
70
Overall
61

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released September 2012
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Superseded the Sony A33
  • Later Model is Sony A37
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 Overview

Below is a detailed assessment of the Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Leica and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and A35 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and A35 (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M Typ 240 was released 13 months later than the A35 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the A35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

				

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Sony A35

 M Typ 240 A35 
IntroducedSeptember 2012September 2011More recent by 13 months

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Leica M Typ 240

 A35 M Typ 240 
Screen resolution921k920kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Sony A35

 M Typ 240 A35 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 features outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Sony A35 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Compare the Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the A35.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and A35 is 74 and 69 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The visual below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and A35.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 240 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M Typ 240
Portrait photography with Sony A35
81
you can focus manually
MP count decent (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
73
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography info
Sony A35 Street photography info
67
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
71
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (415 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A35 as a Sports photography camera
55
MP count decent (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
environment proofing
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
61
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
terrible battery power (440 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A35 as a Travel photography camera
63
environment proofing
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
58
lighter than others in class (415 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
terrible battery power (440 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography info
Sony A35 Landscape photography info
73
you can focus manually
change lenses (Leica M mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
69
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
terrible battery power (440 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M Typ 240
Vlogging with Sony A35
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have mic support
36
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external microphone support
lighter than others in class (415g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M Typ 240 vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Sony A35
 Leica M Typ 240Sony SLT-A35
General Information
Make Leica Sony
Model Leica M Typ 240 Sony SLT-A35
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2012-09-17 2011-09-20
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5952 x 3976 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 59 143
Crop factor 1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 1% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.00 m
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680 grams (1.50 lb) 415 grams (0.91 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 74
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 12.7
DXO Low light score 1860 763
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 440 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $5,479 $598