Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
67 Imaging
71 Features
78 Overall
73
Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Alternative Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 50000
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 847g - 147 x 104 x 39mm
- Released October 2015
- Other Name is Typ 601
- Newer Model is Leica SL2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL Overview
Let's look much closer at the Leica M Typ 262 versus Leica SL, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras and both are built by Leica. The image resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the SL (24MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (Full frame).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M Typ 262 was revealed at a similar time to the SL which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Leica SL being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the SL in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 262 & Leica SL. The full galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Leica SL Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Leica SL
| M Typ 262 | SL |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica SL over the Leica M Typ 262
| SL | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 921k | Crisper screen (+119k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Leica SL
| M Typ 262 | SL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2015 |  | October 2015 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 262 features exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Leica SL has specifications of 147mm x 104mm x 39mm (5.8" x 4.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 847 grams (1.87 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 262 versus Leica SL in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 262 and the SL.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and SL is 77 and 67 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over specs. The photograph here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and SL.
All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of files although you will need to take the age of the products into consideration.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Leica M Typ 262 vs Leica SL Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Leica SL | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Leica |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Leica SL |
| Also called | Typ 262 | Typ 601 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Released | 2015-11-19 | 2015-10-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Maestro | Maestro II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 50000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Leica L |
| Total lenses | 59 | 30 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 4,400 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.8x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 11.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 847g (1.87 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 147 x 104 x 39mm (5.8" x 4.1" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 88 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1821 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BP-SCL4 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported on slot 1) |
| Storage slots | 1 | Two |
| Retail cost | $5,069 | $7,450 |