Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-M1, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-M1 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M Typ 262 was revealed 2 years after the E-M1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the M Typ 262 scores vs the E-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-M1
M Typ 262 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2015 | October 2013 | More modern by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Leica M Typ 262
E-M1 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M1
M Typ 262 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 262 features exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 262 and the E-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-M1 is 77 and 71 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and E-M1.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Also Known as | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-11-19 | 2013-10-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Maestro | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 921k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 497g (1.10 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $5,069 | $799 |