Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is fairly similar but the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) feature different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 262 was unveiled 10 months earlier than the E-M1 II and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the E-M1 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-M1 II
M Typ 262 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica M Typ 262
E-M1 II | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | November 2015 | More recent by 10 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Clearer display (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M1 II
M Typ 262 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 262 comes with outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M1 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 and the E-M1 II.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and E-M1 II is 77 and 68 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-M1 II.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will offer more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older M Typ 262 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Also referred to as | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | One | 2 |
Cost at release | $5,069 | $1,700 |