Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Additionally referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced July 2009
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M Typ 262 was brought out 6 years after the E-P1 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M Typ 262 scores against the E-P1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus PEN E-P1. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-P1
| M Typ 262 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2015 | July 2009 | More modern by 77 months | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Leica M Typ 262
| E-P1 | M Typ 262 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P1
| M Typ 262 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 has got exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-P1 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the E-P1.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and E-P1 is 77 and 86 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and E-P1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will resolve extra detail having its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 262 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
| Other name | Typ 262 | - |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2015-11-19 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Maestro | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-SCL2 | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $5,069 | $182 |