Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1

Portability
77
Imaging
71
Features
35
Overall
56
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
46
Features
42
Overall
44

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Announced November 2015
  • Additionally referred to as Typ 262
Olympus E-P1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-P2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M Typ 262 was brought out 6 years after the E-P1 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M Typ 262 scores against the E-P1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-P1

 M Typ 262 E-P1 
AnnouncedNovember 2015July 2009More modern by 77 months
Display resolution921k230kClearer display (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Leica M Typ 262

 E-P1 M Typ 262 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P1

 M Typ 262 E-P1 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 has got exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-P1 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the E-P1.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and E-P1 is 77 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and E-P1.

As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will resolve extra detail having its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 262 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M Typ 262
Portrait photography with Olympus E-P1
74
has manual focus
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
59
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW files
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M Typ 262
Street photography with Olympus E-P1
65
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Sports photography details
Olympus E-P1 Sports photography details
49
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
39
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
bad battery (300 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M Typ 262
Travel photography with Olympus E-P1
58
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not have selfie friendly display
43
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery (300 per charge)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-P1 Landscape photography features
69
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
60
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
resolution not great (12MP)
bad battery (300 per charge)
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Vlogging details
Olympus E-P1 Vlogging details
22
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great ( pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focusing
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P1
 Leica M Typ 262Olympus PEN E-P1
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 262 Olympus PEN E-P1
Other name Typ 262 -
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2015-11-19 2009-07-29
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Maestro TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 855.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 921k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) None
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution - 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 600 gr (1.32 pounds) 355 gr (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 55
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 536
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model BP-SCL2 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $5,069 $182