Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
86 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Released August 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-P3 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-P3 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M Typ 262 was launched 4 years after the E-P3 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the M Typ 262 grades versus the E-P3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus PEN E-P3. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Olympus E-P3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-P3
| M Typ 262 | E-P3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2015 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 52 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Leica M Typ 262
| E-P3 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P3
| M Typ 262 | E-P3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 262 has got exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P3 has specifications of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the E-P3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-P3 is 77 and 86 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-P3.
All in all, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 262 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
| Also referred to as | Typ 262 | - |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2015-11-19 | 2011-08-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Maestro | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 369 gr (0.81 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 51 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $5,069 | $0 |