Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL6 front
Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released November 2015
  • Also Known as Typ 262
Olympus E-PL6
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
  • Announced August 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL6 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M Typ 262 was launched 16 months later than the E-PL6 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the M Typ 262 matches up vs the E-PL6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL6

 M Typ 262 E-PL6 
AnnouncedNovember 2015August 2014More recent by 16 months
Display resolution921k460kCrisper display (+461k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Leica M Typ 262

 E-PL6 M Typ 262 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL6

 M Typ 262 E-PL6 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL6 has dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).

Check the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the E-PL6.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PL6 is 77 and 88 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-PL6.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 262 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PL6 as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
71
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Street photography advice
Olympus E-PL6 Street photography advice
66
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
85
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Sports photography details
Olympus E-PL6 Sports photography details
50
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PL6 Travel photography factors
58
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
85
provides focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16MP)
screen is selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M Typ 262
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL6
69
manual focus
switch lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count good (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-PL6 Vlogging advice
22
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great ( pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lack of microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL6
 Leica M Typ 262Olympus PEN E-PL6
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M Typ 262 Olympus PEN E-PL6
Other name Typ 262 -
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2015-11-19 2014-08-01
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Maestro TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 855.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5952 x 3976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 35
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 921k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution - 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 600 grams (1.32 pounds) 325 grams (0.72 pounds)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 360 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-SCL2 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $5,069 $300