Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
88 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced August 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL6 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 262 was launched 16 months later than the E-PL6 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the M Typ 262 matches up vs the E-PL6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus PEN E-PL6. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL6
| M Typ 262 | E-PL6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2015 | August 2014 | More recent by 16 months | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Leica M Typ 262
| E-PL6 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL6
| M Typ 262 | E-PL6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL6 has dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Check the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the E-PL6.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PL6 is 77 and 88 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-PL6.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 262 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
| Other name | Typ 262 | - |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2015-11-19 | 2014-08-01 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Maestro | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 pounds) | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $5,069 | $300 |