Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56


88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced August 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL7

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL6 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor measurements.

The M Typ 262 was launched 16 months later than the E-PL6 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the M Typ 262 matches up vs the E-PL6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus PEN E-PL6. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL6
M Typ 262 | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2015 | ![]() | August 2014 | More recent by 16 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Leica M Typ 262
E-PL6 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL6
M Typ 262 | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL6 has dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Check the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the E-PL6.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PL6 is 77 and 88 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-PL6.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 262 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
Other name | Typ 262 | - |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-11-19 | 2014-08-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Maestro | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 pounds) | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $5,069 | $300 |