Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Alternative Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL9
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL8 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL8 (Four Thirds) use different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 262 was manufactured 10 months prior to the E-PL8 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the E-PL8 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus PEN E-PL8. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Olympus E-PL8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL8
M Typ 262 | E-PL8 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Leica M Typ 262
E-PL8 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | November 2015 | Fresher by 10 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL8
M Typ 262 | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 262 offers exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL8 has measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL8 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the M Typ 262 versus the E-PL8.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and E-PL8 is 77 and 86 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and E-PL8.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 262 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older M Typ 262 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL8 |
Alternate name | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-11-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Maestro | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 357 gr (0.79 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $5,069 | $500 |