Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57


85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Other Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-PL9, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.

The M Typ 262 was announced 3 years earlier than the E-PL9 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M Typ 262 scores versus the E-PL9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The whole galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL9
M Typ 262 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Leica M Typ 262
E-PL9 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | November 2015 | More modern by 27 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+119k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL9
M Typ 262 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 262 has physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-PL9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the E-PL9.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PL9 is 77 and 85 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and E-PL9.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will deliver greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 262 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Otherwise known as | Typ 262 | - |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-11-19 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Maestro | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 8.6 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 380 gr (0.84 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $5,069 | $599 |