Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Introduced November 2015
  • Alternative Name is Typ 262
Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PM2
Photography Glossary

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview

In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-PM1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M Typ 262 was unveiled 4 years after the E-PM1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the E-PM1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PM1

 M Typ 262 E-PM1 
LaunchedNovember 2015November 2011More modern by 49 months
Screen resolution921k460kCrisper screen (+461k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Leica M Typ 262

 E-PM1 M Typ 262 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PM1

 M Typ 262 E-PM1 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 262 enjoys outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM1 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).

Check out the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-PM1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the M Typ 262 against the E-PM1.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and E-PM1 is 77 and 89 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and E-PM1.

As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will offer more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography highlights
75
has manual focus
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Street photography details
Olympus E-PM1 Street photography details
66
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-PM1 Sports photography highlights
50
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-PM1 Travel photography highlights
58
megapixel count good (24MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
45
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography details
69
has manual focus
switch lenses (Leica M mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
65
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M Typ 262
Vlogging with Olympus E-PM1
22
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low ( pxls)
lack of mic port
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PM1
 Leica M Typ 262Olympus PEN E-PM1
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M Typ 262 Olympus PEN E-PM1
Alternate name Typ 262 -
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2015-11-19 2011-11-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Maestro TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 855.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 921 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 6.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution - 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 600 gr (1.32 lb) 265 gr (0.58 lb)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 52
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 499
Other
Battery life - 330 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-SCL2 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $5,069 $499