Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
84 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Released January 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus PEN-F, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the PEN-F (20MP) is relatively close but the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and PEN-F (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M Typ 262 was launched 2 months before the PEN-F so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the M Typ 262 grades versus the PEN-F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus PEN-F. The complete galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus PEN-F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus PEN-F
| M Typ 262 | PEN-F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Leica M Typ 262
| PEN-F | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Clearer screen (+116k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus PEN-F
| M Typ 262 | PEN-F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2015 | January 2016 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 features physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus PEN-F has sizing of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus PEN-F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the PEN-F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and PEN-F is 77 and 84 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and PEN-F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus PEN-F Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN-F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN-F |
| Otherwise known as | Typ 262 | - |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2016-01-27 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Maestro | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600g (1.32 lb) | 427g (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 894 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLN-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $5,069 | $1,000 |