Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Other Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009

Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.

The M Typ 262 was introduced 6 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M Typ 262 grades versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
M Typ 262 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 74 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Leica M Typ 262
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
M Typ 262 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 262 has external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 77 and 77 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing specifications. The picture below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 262 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will result in extra detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 262 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Otherwise known as | Typ 262 | - |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Maestro | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $5,069 | $566 |