Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e12/b8e123edbad624b77bc200569372c45fa64c0b47" alt="Leica M Typ 262 front Leica M Typ 262 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2fe/1d2fed2caf199c62565b698420d940e61084850d" alt="Sigma fp front Sigma fp front"
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Also referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced July 2019
- Replacement is Sigma fp L
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Leica and Sigma. The image resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the fp (25MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (Full frame).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The M Typ 262 was unveiled 4 years prior to the fp which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M Typ 262 scores versus the fp with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 and Sigma fp. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Sigma fp
M Typ 262 | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Leica M Typ 262
fp | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2019 | ![]() | November 2015 | More modern by 44 months |
Display size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer display (+1179k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Sigma fp
M Typ 262 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Sigma fp has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Examine the Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M Typ 262 against the fp.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e508/0e5088221ddc193edf9f6effc137f57da92096a5" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp size comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and fp is 77 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8057f/8057ffed5941b49c9713c88ebdfe59fc16e5c5dc" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 262 and fp.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Sigma fp to produce greater detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 262 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ac52/1ac52efe0ee8f02da6642c72b4d469e48b349a58" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4adeb/4adeb300fee787c44085fd16804995458470621a" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Sigma |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Sigma fp |
Also called as | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-11-19 | 2019-07-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Maestro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 25MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Leica L |
Total lenses | 59 | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 422g (0.93 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $5,069 | $2,050 |